|
|
Like this article? PLEASE +1 it! |
|
civil court case Tagged Articles
|
What You Don't Want to See
| |
| Definitions of statuses you don't want to see from the USPTO about your Federal trademark application. |
|
Other civil court case Related Articles
|
THE GREATEST PUBLIC RELATIONS DISASTER EVER
| |
| The so-called "McLibel trial" was an infamous British court case involving libel, with important implications for public relations professionals and company managements.
|
|
|
How the Madison Square Garden Lawsuit Changes Sexual Harassment in the Workplace
| |
| Hall of Fame NBA star Isiah Thomas was surrounded by controversy during his very impressive career on the court, and that is still the case now that he is on the sidelines. |
|
|
6 Quick Tips to Make Your Copy More Believable
| |
| Believability above a certain point makes sales; below that point it does not. Ad copy must make what lawyers call "a prima facie case" -- that is, a case that warrants a trial in court. Only the court is the consumer, and the trial is buying and using the goods. |
|
|
Remedy for Trade Mark Infringement India
| |
| No suit for infringement of a registered trade mark or suit relating to any right in a registered trade mark or for passing off arising out of the use by the defendants of any trade mark which is identical with or deceptively similar to the plaintiff’s trade mark, whether registered or not shall be instituted in any court inferior to a district court having jurisdiction to try the suit.
Procedure followed
The procedure followed in the disposal of the suit is as laid down in code of civil procedure, 1908.
Period of limitation
Under the limitation Act, 1963, the period of limitation for filing a suit for infringement of a trade mark is three years from the date of infringement. Where the infringement is a continuing one, a new course of action arises every time is infringement occurs. |
|
|
Etiquette in TV Court
| |
| It has come to my attention that people, particularly young people, have no clue as to how to act in a court of law, even if it is on TV. So in an effort to help people stop making a fool of themselves in TV court or any court, I have developed some guidelines.
|
|
|
Minnesota Foreclosure Laws
| |
| Are you facing the possibility of foreclosure? Knowing the State law is the key to helping you through the process. Minnesota foreclosures are handled both in court (judicial) and out of court (non-judicial). What does that mean to you? Foreclosures are processed both with and without court intervention, depending on the particular case. The timeline is usually four months, not including the redemption period.
|
|
|
Defeating a Motion to Dismiss a Franchise Case in Federal Court
| |
| A motion to dismiss a complaint in federal court is a relatively inexpensive method to terminate litigation against a defendant. It has the advantage of not revealing the strategy of the defendant’s case while putting the plaintiff in the position of losing his case at the very beginning of litigation. If the defendant loses his motion to dismiss the complaint, he has lost virtually nothing, while the loss of the motion by the plaintiff is devastating. While a motion to dismiss the case can be appealed, the better course of action is to prevail at the district court level. Therefore, a plaintiff must make all possible efforts to defeat this motion. |
|
|
Can a Choice of Forum Clause Force a Franchisee to Litigate In the Franchisor’s Home State?
| |
| A franchisee who has a grievance against his franchisor is not likely to want to pursue litigation in a distant forum, and thus may turn to a state court in his home state. The franchisor typically removes the case to federal court, 1 and then, invoking the forum selection clause in the typical franchise agreement, seeks to transfer the case to the federal court in the franchisor’s home state. |
|
|
Los Angeles County Bar Association Professional Responsibility & Ethics Committee for Legal Outsourcing
| |
| Whether attorney in a civil case who charges an every hour rate may contract with an out-of-state company to draft a brief provided the attorney is competent to review the work, remains ultimately responsible for the �nal work product �led with the court by the attorney on behalf of the client, the attorney does not charge an unconscionable fee, client confidences & secrets are protected, & there is no conflict of interest between the client & the contracting entity. The attorney may be necessary to tell the client of the nature & scope of the contract between attorney & out-of-state company if the brief provided is a significant development in the representation or if the work is a cost which must be disclosed to the client under California law. |
|
|
Making E-Discovery Work To Suit Your Needs
| |
| E-discovery made data collection and analysis easier with regard to legal investigators and lawyers to find relevant information that could be used as evidence in the pre-trial phase of in the court proceedings. These relevant evidences might be a great determining factor on whether the civil case should end up settled or fought within court. The speedy process of data retrieval and analysis is all done with reliable e-discovery software. |
|
Featured Article
Newsletter
Get advice & tips from famous business
owners, new articles by entrepreneur
experts, my latest website updates, &
special sneak peaks at what's to come!
Get advice & tips from famous business
owners, new articles by entrepreneur
experts, my latest website updates, &
special sneak peaks at what's to come!
Suggestions
Email us your ideas on how to make our
website more valuable! Thank you Sharon
from Toronto Salsa Lessons / Classes for
your suggestions to make the newsletter
look like the website and profile younger
entrepreneurs like Jennifer Lopez.
Email us your ideas on how to make our
website more valuable! Thank you Sharon
from Toronto Salsa Lessons / Classes for
your suggestions to make the newsletter
look like the website and profile younger
entrepreneurs like Jennifer Lopez.